3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 2b42b09b88c831ba4da2d669581dde371c38c2af ]

With commit: e1e455f4f4d3 (perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu
in glibc < 2.6), perf_bench numa mem with -c or -m option is not able to
correctly calculate convergence.

With the above commit, sched_getcpu always seems to return -1. The
intention of commit e1e455f was to add a sched_getcpu in glibc < 2.6.
Hence keep the sched_getcpu definition under an ifdef.

This regression happened occurred between v4.0 and v4.1

Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinson Lee <v...@twitter.com>
Fixes:  e1e455f4f4d3 ("perf tools: Work around lack of sched_getcpu in glibc < 
2.6")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150624111004.ga5...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/cloexec.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
index 85b523885f9d..2babddaa2481 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
@@ -7,11 +7,15 @@
 
 static unsigned long flag = PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC;
 
+#ifdef __GLIBC_PREREQ
+#if !__GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 6)
 int __weak sched_getcpu(void)
 {
        errno = ENOSYS;
        return -1;
 }
+#endif
+#endif
 
 static int perf_flag_probe(void)
 {
-- 
2.17.1



Reply via email to