Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/102] 3.2.64-rc1 review

2014-11-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 11:32 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.64 release. > > There are 102 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/102] 3.2.64-rc1 review

2014-11-03 Thread Guillaume Nault
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:02PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.64 release. > There are 102 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/102] 3.2.64-rc1 review

2014-11-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 16:29 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/01/2014 03:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.64 release. > > There are 102 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with

Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/102] 3.2.64-rc1 review

2014-11-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 11/01/2014 03:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.64 release. There are 102 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made

[PATCH 3.2 000/102] 3.2.64-rc1 review

2014-11-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.64 release. There are 102 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Tue Nov 04 00:00:00 UTC 2014. Anything recei