3.2.67-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
commit d297933cc7fcfbaaf2d37570baac73287bf0357d upstream.
Current code tries to find the highest valid fifo depth by checking the value
it wrote to DW_SPI_TXFLTR. There are a few problems in current code:
1) There is an off-by-one in dws->fifo_len setting because it assumes the latest
register write fails so the latest valid value should be fifo - 1.
2) We know the depth could be from 2 to 256 from HW spec, so it is not necessary
to test fifo == 257. In the case fifo is 257, it means the latest valid
setting is fifo = 256. So after the for loop iteration, we should check
fifo == 2 case instead of fifo == 257 if detecting the FIFO depth fails.
This patch fixes above issues.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
drivers/spi/spi-dw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
@@ -786,13 +786,13 @@ static void spi_hw_init(struct dw_spi *d
*/
if (!dws->fifo_len) {
u32 fifo;
- for (fifo = 2; fifo <= 257; fifo++) {
+ for (fifo = 2; fifo <= 256; fifo++) {
dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, fifo);
if (fifo != dw_readw(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR))
break;
}
- dws->fifo_len = (fifo == 257) ? 0 : fifo;
+ dws->fifo_len = (fifo == 2) ? 0 : fifo - 1;
dw_writew(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLTR, 0);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
