..@linaro.org]
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 12:27 AM
> To: Jonghwan Choi
> Cc: Linus Walleij; sta...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Jonghwan Choi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] gpio: fix wrong checking condition for
> gpio range
>
> On 13 Apri
AM
To: Jonghwan Choi
Cc: Linus Walleij; sta...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
Jonghwan Choi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] gpio: fix wrong checking condition for
gpio range
On 13 April 2013 22:46, Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu
On 13 April 2013 22:46, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> From: Haojian Zhuang
>
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> it?
>
It could be merged into 3.8-stable tree.
Regards
Haojian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
From: Haojian Zhuang
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
--
From: "Haojian Zhuang "
commit ad4e1a7caf937ad395ced585ca85a7d14395dc80 upstream
If index++ calculates from 0, the checking condition of "while
(index++)" fails & it doesn't
From: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@linaro.org
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
--
From: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@linaro.org
commit ad4e1a7caf937ad395ced585ca85a7d14395dc80 upstream
If index++ calculates from 0, the checking
On 13 April 2013 22:46, Jonghwan Choi jhbird.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@linaro.org
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
It could be merged into 3.8-stable tree.
Regards
Haojian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
6 matches
Mail list logo
