3.8.13.20 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
------------------
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
commit 10c8562f932d89c030083e15f9279971ed637136 upstream.
GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other
flags and LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller wanted to perform an
atomic allocation, the code must test __GFP_WAIT flag presence. This patch
fixes the issue introduced in v3.6-rc5
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <ka...@canonical.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 5397da0..eb1e6ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static void *arm_iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev,
size_t size,
*handle = DMA_ERROR_CODE;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
return __iommu_alloc_atomic(dev, size, handle);
pages = __iommu_alloc_buffer(dev, size, gfp, attrs);
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
