Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

On 06/18/2013 06:19 PM, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply > it? The PCIe driver doesn't work usefully in that release, so there's not much point back-porting this fix; alone, it won't make PCIe work there. -- To unsubscribe from this

RE: [PATCH 3.9-stable] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

+Stephen to suggest > -Original Message- > From: Jonghwan Choi [mailto:jhbird.c...@samsung.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:49 AM > To: 'Jonghwan Choi'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org; Jay Agarwal > Subject: [PATCH 3.9-stabl

[PATCH 3.9-stable] ARM: tegra30: clocks: Fix pciex clock registration

This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply it? -- From: "Jay Agarwal " commit ff49fad1d9bf2c49f52817b04cde8e4412434637 upstream Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock as tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock ap