On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:23:05AM +, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 09:23 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
>
> It's a condition which appears to be extremely rare: so far, we've only
> seen it d
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 09:23 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> it?
It's a condition which appears to be extremely rare: so far, we've only
seen it during extreme stress testing at NetApp. For that reason, and
because it is NFS
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?
--
From: "Andy Adamson "
commit 774d5f14ee1ecac55f42a84ff35eb00b896b00b6 upstream
On a CB_RECALL the callback service thread flushes the inode using
filemap_flush prior to scheduling the state manager
3 matches
Mail list logo