This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?

------------------

From: "Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com>"

commit 768dc16397fb18c9de209cbcb84d890b8279faa7 upstream

The UART2 hwmod structure is pointing to the EDMA channels of UART1,
which doesn't look right. This patch fixes this by making the UART2
hwmod structure to a new structure that lists the EDMA channels to be
used by the UART2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaib...@ti.com>
[p...@pwsan.com: updated to apply]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.c...@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
index 26eee4a..6a57150 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
@@ -1979,6 +1979,13 @@ static struct omap_hwmod am33xx_uart1_hwmod = {
        },
 };
 
+/* uart2 */
+static struct omap_hwmod_dma_info uart2_edma_reqs[] = {
+       { .name = "tx", .dma_req = 28, },
+       { .name = "rx", .dma_req = 29, },
+       { .dma_req = -1 }
+};
+
 static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info am33xx_uart2_irqs[] = {
        { .irq = 73 + OMAP_INTC_START, },
        { .irq = -1 },
@@ -1989,7 +1996,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod am33xx_uart2_hwmod = {
        .class          = &uart_class,
        .clkdm_name     = "l4ls_clkdm",
        .mpu_irqs       = am33xx_uart2_irqs,
-       .sdma_reqs      = uart1_edma_reqs,
+       .sdma_reqs      = uart2_edma_reqs,
        .main_clk       = "dpll_per_m2_div4_ck",
        .prcm           = {
                .omap4  = {
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to