On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:22:27PM +0200, 'Lars Ellenberg' wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:56:40PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:06:15AM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> > > it?
> >
> >
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:56:40PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:06:15AM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
>
> This seems to be applicable to older kernels as well (starting with
> 3.0 at l
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:06:15AM +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> it?
This seems to be applicable to older kernels as well (starting with
3.0 at least).
I'm queuing it for 3.5.
Cheers,
--
Luis
>
> --
>
Yes, please.
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> it?
>
> --
>
> From: "Philipp Reisner "
>
> commit ef57f9e6bb9278720c8a5278728f252ab85d7ac6 upstream
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner
> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg
> Signed-off-by:
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?
--
From: "Philipp Reisner "
commit ef57f9e6bb9278720c8a5278728f252ab85d7ac6 upstream
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan C
5 matches
Mail list logo