On 12 August 2013 22:03, Stephen Warren wrote:
> It's in defconfig OK; I think the driver simply isn't initializing since
> some of the clocks it requests don't exist. I'll have our clock driver
> author look into it. In the meantime, I assume that your change is
> likely fine.
I wasn't' talking
On 08/09/2013 08:53 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10 August 2013 03:38, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Well, I don't see any issues running this, although the cpufreq sysfs
>> files seem to have disappeared on Tegra, even without your changes, so
>> I'm not sure how to really verify cpufreq.
>>
>> Did th
On 10 August 2013 03:38, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Well, I don't see any issues running this, although the cpufreq sysfs
> files seem to have disappeared on Tegra, even without your changes, so
> I'm not sure how to really verify cpufreq.
>
> Did the sysfs files go away, or do I need to investigate
On 08/09/2013 11:09 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 August 2013 21:49, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/08/2013 10:04 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 8 August 2013 21:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Its useless and the correct routine isn't called at all :) .. I will add
that
additional patch
On 9 August 2013 21:49, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 10:04 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 8 August 2013 21:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Its useless and the correct routine isn't called at all :) .. I will add
>>> that
>>> additional patch and send it to you and will get this change out of
On 08/08/2013 10:04 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 21:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Its useless and the correct routine isn't called at all :) .. I will add that
>> additional patch and send it to you and will get this change out of this
>> commit.
>
> The two commits look like this now
On 8 August 2013 21:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Its useless and the correct routine isn't called at all :) .. I will add that
> additional patch and send it to you and will get this change out of this
> commit.
The two commits look like this now attached too in case you want
to test:
commit 9abdc9
On 8 August 2013 21:14, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 07:48 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
>> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
>
> Assuming the new function simply does what the two removed l
On 08/08/2013 07:48 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Assuming the new function simply does what the two removed lines do,
this looks fine to me.
> static int tegra_c
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Cc: Stephen Warren
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drive
10 matches
Mail list logo
