On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 05:20:36 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
> > and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
> > dropped, so drop
On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
> and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
> dropped, so drop them.
Please hold on for a moment, I would like to discuss the ATA
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 05:20:36 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
On 06/14/2013 08:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
dropped, so drop them.
Please hold on for a moment, I would
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
dropped, so drop them.
Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing
entries from the power_dependent list in struct
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be
dropped, so drop them.
Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing
entries from the
6 matches
Mail list logo
