On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Sebastian Capella
wrote:
> Quoting Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (2013-11-19 06:50:05)
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are you planning to add hibernation support to ARM?
>>
>> If so then this should be stated somewhere in the patch description.
>>
>> OTOH if you are not going to add hib
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham
Cheers,
MyungJoo.
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> di
Quoting Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (2013-11-19 06:50:05)
> Hi,
>
> Are you planning to add hibernation support to ARM?
>
> If so then this should be stated somewhere in the patch description.
>
> OTOH if you are not going to add hibernation support to ARM I see
> a little sense in adding hibernat
Hi,
Are you planning to add hibernation support to ARM?
If so then this should be stated somewhere in the patch description.
OTOH if you are not going to add hibernation support to ARM I see
a little sense in adding hibernation support to ARM-only drivers..
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierk
Frequency lock should be considered in suspend/hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
---
drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c
b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos5_bus.c
index a60da3c..bd672de0 100644
---
5 matches
Mail list logo