Hi,
On 2020-11-10 00:58, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
From what I see from the docs, this is the only version used
in MSM8998(silver cores are based on Cortex A53) and it maps
to r0p4. @Konrad, can you include (rap4 => r0p4) in comment.
Hi,
Thanks for looking into it. Could you perhaps check if it's
> From what I see from the docs, this is the only version used
> in MSM8998(silver cores are based on Cortex A53) and it maps
> to r0p4. @Konrad, can you include (rap4 => r0p4) in comment.
Hi,
Thanks for looking into it. Could you perhaps check if it's also the case on
sdm630/636/660?
Konrad
Hi Marc,
On 2020-11-05 14:59, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-11-04 23:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
QCOM KRYO2XX Silver cores are Cortex-A53 based and are
susceptible to the 845719 erratum. Add them to the lookup
list to apply the erratum.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errat
> Is this the only affected version? If this is actually an A53, how do the
> revisions map between Kryo and Cortex cores?
Hi,
sadly, I do not have access to such information. Only this specific revision
has been marked as affected in the BSP kernel.
Konrad
On 2020-11-04 23:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
QCOM KRYO2XX Silver cores are Cortex-A53 based and are
susceptible to the 845719 erratum. Add them to the lookup
list to apply the erratum.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --
QCOM KRYO2XX Silver cores are Cortex-A53 based and are
susceptible to the 845719 erratum. Add them to the lookup
list to apply the erratum.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/
6 matches
Mail list logo
