2020-05-28 19:09 GMT+09:00, Tetsuhiro Kohada :
>>> I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
>>> If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?
>> I will apply them after testing at once if you send updated 5 patches
>> again.
>
> I resend patches for
I'll repost the patch, based on the dir-cache patched dev-tree.
If dir-cache patch will merge into dev-tree, should I wait until then?
I will apply them after testing at once if you send updated 5 patches again.
I resend patches for boot_sector.
However, the dir-cache patch hasn't changed, so
atches in the following order.
> > 1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
> > 2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector 3. [PATCH 2/4]
> > exfat: separate the boot sector analysis 4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add
> > boot region verification 5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize c
] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
3. [PATCH 2/4] exfat: separate the boot sector analysis
4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add boot region verification
5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
I was able to reproduce it.
The dir-cache patch was created based on the HEAD of dev-tree.
The 4
I can't reproduce the error. (Both succeed)
> How do you reproduce the error?
I tried to appy your patches in the following order.
1. [PATCH] exfat: optimize dir-cache
2. [PATCH 1/4] exfat: redefine PBR as boot_sector
3. [PATCH 2/4] exfat: separate the boot sector analysis
4. [PATCH 3/4] exfat: add boot region verification
5. [PATCH 4/4] exfat: standardize checksum calculation
Thanks!
>
> BR
>
Thank you for your comment.
I can not apply this patch to exfat dev tree. Could you please check it ?
patching file fs/exfat/dir.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 491 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 500 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 508 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 600.
Hunk #5
> To clarify that it is a 16-bit checksum, the parts related to the 16-bit
> checksum are renamed and
> change type to u16.
> Furthermore, replace checksum calculation in exfat_load_upcase_table() with
> exfat_calc_checksum32().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada
I can not apply this patch
To clarify that it is a 16-bit checksum, the parts related to the 16-bit
checksum are renamed and change type to u16.
Furthermore, replace checksum calculation in exfat_load_upcase_table()
with exfat_calc_checksum32().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuhiro Kohada
---
fs/exfat/dir.c | 12 ++--
8 matches
Mail list logo
