On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:19:13PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/10/2014 08:00 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:59:17AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>On 12/08/2014 08:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>>From: Joonsoo Kim
> >>>
> >>>Currently, freepage isolation in one pa
On 12/10/2014 08:00 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:59:17AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 12/08/2014 08:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
From: Joonsoo Kim
Currently, freepage isolation in one pageblock doesn't consider how many
freepages we isolate. When I traced flow of compact
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:59:17AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 08:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >From: Joonsoo Kim
> >
> >Currently, freepage isolation in one pageblock doesn't consider how many
> >freepages we isolate. When I traced flow of compaction, compaction
> >sometimes isol
On 12/08/2014 08:16 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
From: Joonsoo Kim
Currently, freepage isolation in one pageblock doesn't consider how many
freepages we isolate. When I traced flow of compaction, compaction
sometimes isolates more than 256 freepages to migrate just 32 pages.
In this patch, freepage
From: Joonsoo Kim
Currently, freepage isolation in one pageblock doesn't consider how many
freepages we isolate. When I traced flow of compaction, compaction
sometimes isolates more than 256 freepages to migrate just 32 pages.
In this patch, freepage isolation is stopped at the point that we
hav
5 matches
Mail list logo