Re: [PATCH 4/4] objtool: Don't print '.tmp_' prefix for .o files

2018-01-30 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:58:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:00:42PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > With the following commit: > > > > > > 2a0098d70640 ("objtool: Fix seg fault with gold linker") > > > > > > ... objtool warnings

Re: [PATCH 4/4] objtool: Don't print '.tmp_' prefix for .o files

2018-01-30 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:58:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:00:42PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > With the following commit: > > > > 2a0098d70640 ("objtool: Fix seg fault with gold linker") > > > > ... objtool warnings started showing the modversions '.tmp_'

Re: [PATCH 4/4] objtool: Don't print '.tmp_' prefix for .o files

2018-01-30 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:00:42PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > With the following commit: > > 2a0098d70640 ("objtool: Fix seg fault with gold linker") > > ... objtool warnings started showing the modversions '.tmp_' prefix in > the .o file name, like: > > arch/x86/mm/.tmp_mem_encrypt_boot

[PATCH 4/4] objtool: Don't print '.tmp_' prefix for .o files

2018-01-29 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
With the following commit: 2a0098d70640 ("objtool: Fix seg fault with gold linker") ... objtool warnings started showing the modversions '.tmp_' prefix in the .o file name, like: arch/x86/mm/.tmp_mem_encrypt_boot.o: warning: objtool: sme_encrypt_execute()+0x48: indirect call found in RETPOL