Hi Taeung,
On Wednesday 22 February 2017 03:38 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(¬es->src->code);
> +
> + while (!feof(file)) {
> + int nr;
> + char *c, *parsed_line;
> + struct source_code *code;
> +
> + if (getline(&line, &len, file
On 02/22/2017 08:27 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
The output of perf-annotate has a problem.
It is so confusing that the output is mixed with
both source code and assembly code.
IMHO, we need readable annotate view based on source code,
not mixed
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
> The output of perf-annotate has a problem.
> It is so confusing that the output is mixed with
> both source code and assembly code.
> IMHO, we need readable annotate view based on source code,
> not mixed view. (not depending on 'objdump -S')
>
The output of perf-annotate has a problem.
It is so confusing that the output is mixed with
both source code and assembly code.
IMHO, we need readable annotate view based on source code,
not mixed view. (not depending on 'objdump -S')
And to do that, we can collect actual source code per function(
4 matches
Mail list logo