Em Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:33:20AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/5/13, 6:50 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:41:42PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> >>Perhaps there is a better way to do this; I could not think of one and
> >>I don't see any field in the trace
On 12/5/13, 6:50 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:41:42PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
Perhaps there is a better way to do this; I could not think of one and
I don't see any field in the tracepoint that can be leveraged. So ...
perf-trace autodetects the machine ty
Em Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:41:42PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> Perhaps there is a better way to do this; I could not think of one and
> I don't see any field in the tracepoint that can be leveraged. So ...
>
> perf-trace autodetects the machine type (e.g., i386, x86_64, etc) via
> libaudit.
An
Perhaps there is a better way to do this; I could not think of one and
I don't see any field in the tracepoint that can be leveraged. So ...
perf-trace autodetects the machine type (e.g., i386, x86_64, etc) via
libaudit. When running 32-bit apps on a 64-bit kernel the wrong machine
type is used to
4 matches
Mail list logo