Re: [PATCH 4/4] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip boundary

2016-04-28 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:30:18AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:02:47AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > From: Sascha Hauer > > > > > > With interrupt driven thermal zones we pass the lower and upper >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip boundary

2016-04-27 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:02:47AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > From: Sascha Hauer > > > > With interrupt driven thermal zones we pass the lower and upper > > temperature on which shall be acted, so in the governor we have to ac

Re: [PATCH 4/4] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip boundary

2016-04-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:02:47AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer > > With interrupt driven thermal zones we pass the lower and upper > temperature on which shall be acted, so in the governor we have to act on > the exact lower temperature to be consistent. Otherwise an interrupt

[PATCH 4/4] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower trip boundary

2016-04-24 Thread Caesar Wang
From: Sascha Hauer With interrupt driven thermal zones we pass the lower and upper temperature on which shall be acted, so in the governor we have to act on the exact lower temperature to be consistent. Otherwise an interrupt maybe generated on the exact lower temperature, but the bang bang gover