On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:44:30AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:52:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
> > due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
> > This
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:52:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
> due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
> This experimental patch maps synchronize_sched() back onto Classic RCU,
>
The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
This experimental patch maps synchronize_sched() back onto Classic RCU,
eliminating the migration, thus hopefully also eliminating the deadlocks.
It is
The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
This experimental patch maps synchronize_sched() back onto Classic RCU,
eliminating the migration, thus hopefully also eliminating the deadlocks.
It is
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:52:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
This experimental patch maps synchronize_sched() back onto Classic RCU,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:44:30AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:52:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The combination of CPU hotplug and PREEMPT_RCU has resulted in deadlocks
due to the migration-based implementation of synchronize_sched() in -rt.
This
6 matches
Mail list logo
