Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-17 Thread David Miller
From: Lee Jones Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:44 + > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1926971/ I'm fine with this: Acked-by: David S. Miller -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-17 Thread Lee Jones
> >> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the > >> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk > >> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just > >> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock > >> > is req

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-17 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the >> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk >> > fra

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-09 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 9 January 2013 09:55, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the >> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk >> > framework

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-09 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the > > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk > > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-07 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the > > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk > > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will

Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-03 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just > be ignored and the driver will continue to ass

[PATCH 4/4 v3] net/smsc911x: Provide common clock functionality

2013-01-03 Thread Lee Jones
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock is required for the chip to run successful