Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-31 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:41:05 +0200 Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- a/include/linux/isdn.h > +++ b/include/linux/isdn.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > #define __ISDN_H__ > > #include > +#include Breaks `make headers_check'. That was covered in sections 2 and 20 of

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-31 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:41:05 +0200 Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- a/include/linux/isdn.h +++ b/include/linux/isdn.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #define __ISDN_H__ #include linux/ioctl.h +#include linux/mutex.h Breaks `make headers_check'. That was covered in sections 2 and 20

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-30 Thread Karsten Keil
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:41:05PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the > mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Karsten Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-30 Thread Karsten Keil
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:41:05PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Karsten Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Karsten

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-29 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the > mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reviewed-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from

[PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-29 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- diff --git a/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_common.c b/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_common.c index c97330b..a5d3db4 100644 ---

[PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-29 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- diff --git a/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_common.c b/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_common.c index c97330b..a5d3db4 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in ISDN subsystem common functions

2007-07-29 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: The ISDN subsystem common functions use a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API instead of the (binary) semaphore. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reviewed-by: Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: