On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:40:08 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, the funny thing is that, looking at my shell history, I think I
> actually did the right thing when committing your patches:
>
> git commit -s --author 'Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> git commit -s
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:19:39 -0500 (EST)
Chip Coldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
> > Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
> >
>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:15:24 +0100
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/18/2007 06:06 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > port = _ports[pdev->id];
> > atmel_init_port(port, pdev);
> >
> > + data = kmalloc(ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data)
>
> {
>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:15:24 +0100
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/18/2007 06:06 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
port = atmel_ports[pdev-id];
atmel_init_port(port, pdev);
+ data = kmalloc(ATMEL_SERIAL_RINGSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
{
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:19:39 -0500 (EST)
Chip Coldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
Looks like Chip's
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:40:08 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, the funny thing is that, looking at my shell history, I think I
actually did the right thing when committing your patches:
git commit -s --author 'Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
git commit -s --author 'Chip
On 12/18/2007 06:06 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch splits up the interrupt handler of the serial port
> into a interrupt top-half and a tasklet.
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: misc cleanups and simplifications]
> Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
> Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
>
> Looks
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
Looks like Chip's address got mangled too.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
From: Remy Bohmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch splits up the interrupt handler of the serial port
into a interrupt top-half and a tasklet.
The goal is to get the interrupt top-half as short as possible to
minimize latencies on interrupts. But the old code also does some
calls in the interrupt
From: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch splits up the interrupt handler of the serial port
into a interrupt top-half and a tasklet.
The goal is to get the interrupt top-half as short as possible to
minimize latencies on interrupts. But the old code also does some
calls in the interrupt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
Looks like Chip's address got mangled too.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:06:14 +0100
Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh. That's obviously wrong. Wonder what happened there?
Looks like Chip's
On 12/18/2007 06:06 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
From: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch splits up the interrupt handler of the serial port
into a interrupt top-half and a tasklet.
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: misc cleanups and simplifications]
Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
