[PATCH 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child()

In all likelihood there were some subtle, and perhaps not so subtle, bugs with filename matching in audit_inode() and audit_inode_child() for some time, however, recent changes to the audit filename code have definitely broken the filename matching code. The breakage could result in duplicate file

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child()

On 15/01/08, Paul Moore wrote: > In all likelihood there were some subtle, and perhaps not so subtle, > bugs with filename matching in audit_inode() and audit_inode_child() > for some time, however, recent changes to the audit filename code have > definitely broken the filename matching code. The

[RFC PATCH 4/5] audit: fix filename matching in __audit_inode() and __audit_inode_child()

In all likelihood there were some subtle, and perhaps not so subtle, bugs with filename matching in audit_inode() and audit_inode_child() for some time, however, recent changes to the audit filename code have definitely broken the filename matching code. The breakage could result in duplicate file