On 06/01/2016 03:58 AM, Huang, Tao wrote:
Hi Daniel:
On 2016年05月31日 22:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(rk_timer, "rockchip,rk3288-timer", rk_timer_init);
+static void __init rk3288_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ bc_timer.ctrl = TIMER_CONTROL_REG3288;
+
Hi Daniel:
On 2016年05月31日 22:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> @@ -46,15 +48,20 @@ static inline void __iomem *rk_base(struct
>> clock_event_device *ce)
>> return rk_timer(ce)->base;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void __iomem *rk_ctrl(struct clock_event_device *ce)
>> +{
>> +return rk_timer(ce
On 05/31/2016 03:46 PM, Huang, Tao wrote:
Hi Daniel:
On 2016年05月31日 07:28, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/25/2016 11:50 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
From: Huang Tao
The CONTROL register offset is different from old SoCs.
For Linux driver, there are not functional changes at all.
Let's call it v2.
Sig
Hi Daniel:
On 2016年05月31日 07:28, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 11:50 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> From: Huang Tao
>>
>> The CONTROL register offset is different from old SoCs.
>> For Linux driver, there are not functional changes at all.
>> Let's call it v2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Tao
>>
On 05/25/2016 11:50 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
From: Huang Tao
The CONTROL register offset is different from old SoCs.
For Linux driver, there are not functional changes at all.
Let's call it v2.
Signed-off-by: Huang Tao
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Heiko Stuebner
Tested-by: Jian
From: Huang Tao
The CONTROL register offset is different from old SoCs.
For Linux driver, there are not functional changes at all.
Let's call it v2.
Signed-off-by: Huang Tao
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Heiko Stuebner
Tested-by: Jianqun Xu
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
---
dri
6 matches
Mail list logo
