On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:37:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Steve Muckle
>> wrote:
>> > The mechanisms for remote CPU updates and slow-path frequency
>> > transitions are relatively expensive - the
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:37:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > The mechanisms for remote CPU updates and slow-path frequency
> > transitions are relatively expensive - the former is an IPI while the
> > latter requires waking up a thre
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> The mechanisms for remote CPU updates and slow-path frequency
> transitions are relatively expensive - the former is an IPI while the
> latter requires waking up a thread to do work. These activities should
> be avoided if they are not necessa
The mechanisms for remote CPU updates and slow-path frequency
transitions are relatively expensive - the former is an IPI while the
latter requires waking up a thread to do work. These activities should
be avoided if they are not necessary. To that end, calculate the
actual target-supported frequen
4 matches
Mail list logo