Re: [PATCH 4/5] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/main.c: introduce missing initialization

On 08/19/2012 12:25 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > The result of one call to a function is tested, and then at the second call > to the same function, the previous result, and not the current result, is > tested again. > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/main.c: introduce missing initialization

On 08/19/2012 12:25 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr The result of one call to a function is tested, and then at the second call to the same function, the previous result, and not the current result, is tested again. The semantic match that finds this

[PATCH 4/5] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/main.c: introduce missing initialization

From: Julia Lawall The result of one call to a function is tested, and then at the second call to the same function, the previous result, and not the current result, is tested again. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @@ expression ret;

[PATCH 4/5] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/main.c: introduce missing initialization

From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr The result of one call to a function is tested, and then at the second call to the same function, the previous result, and not the current result, is tested again. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) //