On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> gpio_lock/unlock_as_irq() are working with (chip, offset) arguments and
> are thus not using the old integer namespace. Therefore, there is no
> reason to have gpiod variants of these functions working with
> descriptors, especially sinc
gpio_lock/unlock_as_irq() are working with (chip, offset) arguments and
are thus not using the old integer namespace. Therefore, there is no
reason to have gpiod variants of these functions working with
descriptors, especially since the (chip, offset) tuple is more suitable
to the users of these fu
2 matches
Mail list logo
