On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 05-02-08 20:21:58, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of
> > >
On Tue 05-02-08 20:21:58, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of
> > > udf_stamp_to_time
> > > and udf_time_to_stamp used it, so let the
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of udf_stamp_to_time
> > and udf_time_to_stamp used it, so let these functions handle endianness
> > internally and don't clutter
On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of udf_stamp_to_time
> and udf_time_to_stamp used it, so let these functions handle endianness
> internally and don't clutter code with conversions
OK, but please also rename the functions
kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of udf_stamp_to_time
and udf_time_to_stamp used it, so let these functions handle endianness
internally and don't clutter code with conversions
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/udf/inod
5 matches
Mail list logo