On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0800
> Cong Wang wrote:
>
> > When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
> > notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
> >
> > Cc: "David S. Miller"
> >
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:50 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0800
Cong Wang amw...@redhat.com wrote:
When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
Cc: David S. Miller
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0800
Cong Wang wrote:
> When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
> notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
>
> Cc: "David S. Miller"
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
> ---
> net/bridge/br_if.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1
When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
---
net/bridge/br_if.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c
When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang amw...@redhat.com
---
net/bridge/br_if.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:38:01 +0800
Cong Wang amw...@redhat.com wrote:
When a bridge interface deletes its underlying ports, it should
notify netconsole too, like what bonding interface does.
Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang amw...@redhat.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo