Hi Arnaldo,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Can you check how is this in the current perf/core branch so that we can
> move forward while I process some other patches?
perf/completion is now 3 months old, and my more recent patches have
already been merged into Linus' tree. Why is perf/completi
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Can you check how is this in the current perf/core branch so that we can
> move forward while I process some other patches?
This series (except this part) was merged into perf/completion of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux 3 weeks ago,
so I
Em Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:52:55PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Huh? Why would this be more "modern", if both are equivalent, I think
> > applying the same rules as we have for C code applies here.
>
> It's the prevalent style in git.git, and I figure
Em Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 06:11:28PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
> ---
> tools/perf/bash_completion | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bash_completion b/tools/perf/bash_completion
> index d2598be..
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Huh? Why would this be more "modern", if both are equivalent, I think
> applying the same rules as we have for C code applies here.
It's the prevalent style in git.git, and I figured that it was picked
up from linux.git but didn't check. Drop this part otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
---
tools/perf/bash_completion | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bash_completion b/tools/perf/bash_completion
index d2598be..8c04f5d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bash_completion
+++ b/tools/perf/bash_completion
@@ -7,
6 matches
Mail list logo