On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 07-01-08 22:10:01, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > I'm
On Mon 07-01-08 22:10:01, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
> >
On Mon 07-01-08 22:10:01, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
really a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 07-01-08 22:10:01, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure if this
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
> really a loop in nature, then we should code it using do
On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
really a loop in nature, then we should code it using do {} while but in
case we loop back just in case of some error (as
On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
really a loop in nature, then we should code it using do {} while but in
case we loop back just in case of some error (as seems
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 06-01-08 02:21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure if this improves readability in general. If the code is
really a loop in nature, then we should code it using do {} while
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/udf/balloc.c | 309 ---
1 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
index d1d4b8f..5ce7926 100644
--- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
+++
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/udf/balloc.c | 309 ---
1 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/udf/balloc.c b/fs/udf/balloc.c
index d1d4b8f..5ce7926 100644
--- a/fs/udf/balloc.c
+++
10 matches
Mail list logo