On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:59:03PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> It makes sense to do all the checks in check_region() and not 1/2
> in check_region and 1/2 in set_region.
>
> Since set_region is called immediately after check_region, the net
> effect on runtime is zero, but it gets rid of an if
It makes sense to do all the checks in check_region() and not 1/2
in check_region and 1/2 in set_region.
Since set_region is called immediately after check_region, the net
effect on runtime is zero, but it gets rid of an if (...) return...
Cc: Yury Norov
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes
Cc: Andy
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:12 AM Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>
> It makes sense to do all the checks in check_region() and not 1/2
> in check_region and 1/2 in set_region.
>
> Since set_region is called immediately after check_region, the net
> effect on runtime is zero, but it gets rid of an if (...)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:11:37PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> It makes sense to do all the checks in check_region() and not 1/2
> in check_region and 1/2 in set_region.
>
> Since set_region is called immediately after check_region, the net
> effect on runtime is zero, but it gets rid of an if
It makes sense to do all the checks in check_region() and not 1/2
in check_region and 1/2 in set_region.
Since set_region is called immediately after check_region, the net
effect on runtime is zero, but it gets rid of an if (...) return...
Cc: Yury Norov
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes
Cc: Andy
5 matches
Mail list logo