Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target

2017-03-01 Thread Hillf Danton
On March 01, 2017 5:40 AM Johannes Weiner wrote: > > NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to > decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is > reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner

Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target

2017-03-01 Thread Michal Hocko
On Tue 28-02-17 16:40:02, Johannes Weiner wrote: > NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to > decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is > reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim. I guess the original intention was to ski

[PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target

2017-02-28 Thread Johannes Weiner
NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner --- mm/migrate.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff