On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:14:06PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 14:10 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton (1):
> > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: work around gcc-4.4.4 bug
> > >
> > > which must be it. Added Andrew to cc as he hopefully knows the
> > answer t
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 14:10 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Andrew Morton (1):
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: work around gcc-4.4.4 bug
> >
> > which must be it. Added Andrew to cc as he hopefully knows the
> answer to your question.
>
> You can dig through git to find it pretty easily...
>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:02:31PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 11:13 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> > > a
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 11:13 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> > a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
> > Ju
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> Greg,
>
> The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
> Jul 13 18:08:30 EDT 2015 x86_64 Fedora 14)
>
> This mis-compile was f
Greg,
The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
Jul 13 18:08:30 EDT 2015 x86_64 Fedora 14)
This mis-compile was fixed in 4.1-rc8. The diff was:
diff -ur linux-4.1-rc7/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
lin
On Monday, July 20, 2015 03:04:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> > > There are 58 patches
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On 07/19/2015 01:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sho
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:10:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On 07/19/2015 12:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be mad
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Tue Jul 21 19:08:01 UTC 2015.
Anything received
13 matches
Mail list logo
