On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:08:13AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 3 September 2018 at 22:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Peter Zijlstra
> >
> > commit d86564a2f085b79ec046a
On 04. sep. 2018 08:10, Andre Tomt wrote:
On 04. sep. 2018 07:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Full test log link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/404027#L4051
Does Linus's tree also crash with this patch applied? Being "bug
compatible" is good :)
thanks,
greg k-h
I suspect
>> Full test log link,
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/404027#L4051
>
> Does Linus's tree also crash with this patch applied? Being "bug
> compatible" is good :)
No.
It did not crash on mainline kernel.
- Naresh
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On 04. sep. 2018 07:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Full test log link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/404027#L4051
Does Linus's tree also crash with this patch applied? Being "bug
compatible" is good :)
thanks,
greg k-h
I suspect it is because we're missing upstream commi
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:08:13AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 3 September 2018 at 22:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Peter Zijlstra
> >
> > commit d86564a2f085b79ec046a
On 3 September 2018 at 22:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Peter Zijlstra
>
> commit d86564a2f085b79ec046a5cba90188e612352806 upstream.
>
> Jann reported that x86 was missing required TLB
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Peter Zijlstra
commit d86564a2f085b79ec046a5cba90188e612352806 upstream.
Jann reported that x86 was missing required TLB invalidates when he
hit the !*batch slow path in tlb_remove_table().
T
7 matches
Mail list logo