4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ming Lei <ming....@redhat.com>

commit 744889b7cbb56a64f957e65ade7cb65fe3f35714 upstream.

blk_queue_split() does respect this limit via bio splitting, so no
need to do that in blkdev_issue_discard(), then we can align to
normal bio submit(bio_add_page() & submit_bio()).

More importantly, this patch fixes one issue introduced in a22c4d7e34402cc
("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment checks"), in which
zero discard bio may be generated in case of zero alignment.

Fixes: a22c4d7e34402ccdf3 ("block: re-add discard_granularity and alignment 
checks")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ming Lin <min...@ssi.samsung.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snit...@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Xiao Ni <x...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming....@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-lib.c |   28 ++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_
 {
        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
        struct bio *bio = *biop;
-       unsigned int granularity;
        unsigned int op;
-       int alignment;
        sector_t bs_mask;
 
        if (!q)
@@ -54,38 +52,16 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_
        if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
-       granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-       alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
-
        while (nr_sects) {
-               unsigned int req_sects;
-               sector_t end_sect, tmp;
+               unsigned int req_sects = nr_sects;
+               sector_t end_sect;
 
-               /*
-                * Issue in chunks of the user defined max discard setting,
-                * ensuring that bi_size doesn't overflow
-                */
-               req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects,
-                                       q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
                if (!req_sects)
                        goto fail;
                if (req_sects > UINT_MAX >> 9)
                        req_sects = UINT_MAX >> 9;
 
-               /*
-                * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
-                * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
-                */
                end_sect = sector + req_sects;
-               tmp = end_sect;
-               if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
-                   sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
-                       end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
-                       sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
-                       end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
-                       req_sects = end_sect - sector;
-               }
 
                bio = next_bio(bio, 0, gfp_mask);
                bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;


Reply via email to