On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:57 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-05-05 11:32:27, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:05:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > I'm a bit confused about this too. Maybe it's too early in the morning,
> > so I wrote this little test program:
> >
>
On Tue 2020-05-05 11:32:27, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:05:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2020-05-05 16:19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > On
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:05:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2020-05-05 16:19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 5
On Tue 2020-05-05 17:05:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2020-05-05 16:19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-05-05 16:19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > So, to th
On Tue 2020-05-05 16:19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be
> > > >
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped
> > > > being
> > > > first part of conjunction logic prev
On Tue 2020-05-05 15:51:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped
> > > being
> > > first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we
> > > have to
> > > always
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 3:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped being
> > first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we have
> > to
> > always check both conditions to be able to stop after given
> > iterations
Hi!
> So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped being
> first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we have to
> always check both conditions to be able to stop after given
> iterations.
I ... don't understand. AFAICT the code is equivalent. Bo
From: Andy Shevchenko
commit b9f960201249f20deea586b4ec814669b4c6b1c0 upstream.
Under some circumstances, i.e. when test is still running and about to
time out and user runs, for example,
grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/*
the iterations parameter is not respected and test is g
11 matches
Mail list logo
