On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > > I don't think so, I don't get warnings for "make ARCH=mips
> > > lemote2f_defconfig"
> >
> > Ok, is it worth reverting as this is an issue on later
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > > I don't think so, I don't get warnings for "make ARCH=mips
> > > lemote2f_defconfig"
> >
> > Ok, is it worth reverting as this is an issue on later
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > I don't think so, I don't get warnings for "make ARCH=mips
> > lemote2f_defconfig"
>
> Ok, is it worth reverting as this is an issue on later kernels?
Same answer as for the other patch - I can't imagine it's going to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > I don't think so, I don't get warnings for "make ARCH=mips
> > lemote2f_defconfig"
>
> Ok, is it worth reverting as this is an issue on later kernels?
Same answer as for the other patch - I can't imagine it's going to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:15:30AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:15:30AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > commit
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > commit
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > commit
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > commit
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> commit b3f6046186ef45acfeebc5a59c9fb45cefc685e7 upstream.
>
> Since linux-4.8,
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 23:29 +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> commit b3f6046186ef45acfeebc5a59c9fb45cefc685e7 upstream.
>
> Since linux-4.8, CPU_FREQ_STAT is a bool
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit b3f6046186ef45acfeebc5a59c9fb45cefc685e7 upstream.
Since linux-4.8, CPU_FREQ_STAT is a bool symbol, causing a warning in
kernelci.org:
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit b3f6046186ef45acfeebc5a59c9fb45cefc685e7 upstream.
Since linux-4.8, CPU_FREQ_STAT is a bool symbol, causing a warning in
kernelci.org:
14 matches
Mail list logo