On Tue 20-11-18 15:53:10, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > > know.
On Tue 20-11-18 15:53:10, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > > know.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> >
> > As I noted when this patch was originally
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> >
> > As I noted when this patch was originally
On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
>
> As I noted when this patch was originally proposed and when I nacked it[*]
> because it causes a 13.9%
On Mon 19-11-18 14:16:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
>
> As I noted when this patch was originally proposed and when I nacked it[*]
> because it causes a 13.9%
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
As I noted when this patch was originally proposed and when I nacked it[*]
because it causes a 13.9% increase in remote memory access latency and up
to 40% increase
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
As I noted when this patch was originally proposed and when I nacked it[*]
because it causes a 13.9% increase in remote memory access latency and up
to 40% increase
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrea Arcangeli
commit ac5b2c18911ffe95c08d69273917f90212cf5659 upstream.
THP allocation might be really disruptive when allocated on NUMA system
with the local node full or hard to reclaim.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrea Arcangeli
commit ac5b2c18911ffe95c08d69273917f90212cf5659 upstream.
THP allocation might be really disruptive when allocated on NUMA system
with the local node full or hard to reclaim.
10 matches
Mail list logo