From: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com>

commit 370a132bb2227ff76278f98370e0e701d86ff752 upstream.

When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used
to read out the microcode revision on the box.

However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode
revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because
boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated.

But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member
should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency.

Make it so.

Fixes: fa94d0c6e0f3 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check 
records")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>
Cc: sir...@amazon.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731112739.32338-1-pra...@redhat.com
[bwh: Backported to 4.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c   |    4 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -712,6 +712,10 @@ int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
        uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
        c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
 
+       /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
+       if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
+               boot_cpu_data.microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id;
+
        return 0;
 }
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -905,6 +905,10 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu
        uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
        c->microcode = rev;
 
+       /* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
+       if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
+               boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev;
+
        return 0;
 }
 


Reply via email to