Re: [PATCH 4.4 60/67] powerpc/tm: Check for already reclaimed tasks

2016-05-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:04:17PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 08:32 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 01/27/2016, 07:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me > > > know. > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 4.4 60/67] powerpc/tm: Check for already reclaimed tasks

2016-05-03 Thread Michael Neuling
On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 08:32 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 01/27/2016, 07:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Michael Neuling > > > > commit 7f821fc9c77a9b01fe7b1d6e7271

Re: [PATCH 4.4 60/67] powerpc/tm: Check for already reclaimed tasks

2016-05-02 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 01/27/2016, 07:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Michael Neuling > > commit 7f821fc9c77a9b01fe7b1d6e72717b33d8d64142 upstream. > > Currently we can hit a scenario where we'll tm_rec

[PATCH 4.4 60/67] powerpc/tm: Check for already reclaimed tasks

2016-01-27 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Michael Neuling commit 7f821fc9c77a9b01fe7b1d6e72717b33d8d64142 upstream. Currently we can hit a scenario where we'll tm_reclaim() twice. This results in a TM bad thing exception because the s