Re: [PATCH 42/59] sysctl: Remove sys_sysctl support from the hpet timer driver.

2007-01-16 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted > > In the binary sysctl interface the hpet driver was claiming to > be the cdrom driver. This is a no-no so remove support for the > binary interface. > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[PATCH 42/59] sysctl: Remove sys_sysctl support from the hpet timer driver.

2007-01-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted In the binary sysctl interface the hpet driver was claiming to be the cdrom driver. This is a no-no so remove support for the binary interface. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/char/hpet.c |4 ++-- 1

Re: [PATCH 42/59] sysctl: Remove sys_sysctl support from the hpet timer driver.

2007-01-16 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Eric W. Biederman wrote: From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted In the binary sysctl interface the hpet driver was claiming to be the cdrom driver. This is a no-no so remove support for the binary interface. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by:

[PATCH 42/59] sysctl: Remove sys_sysctl support from the hpet timer driver.

2007-01-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted In the binary sysctl interface the hpet driver was claiming to be the cdrom driver. This is a no-no so remove support for the binary interface. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/char/hpet.c |4 ++-- 1 files