Re: [PATCH 5/5] Mark page cache pages as __GFP_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_MOVABLE

2007-05-18 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:03 +0100 (IST) Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1-025_gfphighuser/fs/buffer.c2007-05-16 22:55:50.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1-030_pagecache_mark/fs/buffer.c 2007-05-16 23:07:30.000

Re: [PATCH 5/5] Mark page cache pages as __GFP_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_MOVABLE

2007-05-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:03 +0100 (IST) Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1-025_gfphighuser/fs/buffer.c 2007-05-16 > 22:55:50.0 +0100 > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1-mm1-030_pagecache_mark/fs/buffer.c 2007-05-16 > 23:07:30.0 +0100 > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7

[PATCH 5/5] Mark page cache pages as __GFP_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_MOVABLE

2007-05-17 Thread Mel Gorman
This patch marks page cache allocations as __GFP_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_MOVABLE. To make code easier to read, a set of three GFP flags are added called GFP_PAGECACHE, GFP_NOFS_PAGECACHE and GFP_HIGHUSER_PAGECACHE. grow_dev_page() is changed to use GFP_NOFS_PAGECACHE instead of __GFP_RECLAIMAB