* Pantelis Antoniou [130807 09:31]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > * Pantelis Antoniou [130806 02:44]:
> >> On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> +
>
* Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com [130807 09:31]:
Hi Tony,
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com [130806 02:44]:
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300,
Hi Tony,
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pantelis Antoniou [130806 02:44]:
>> On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
+
static int _omap_device_notifier_call(struct
* Pantelis Antoniou [130806 02:44]:
> On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> +
> >> static int _omap_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
> >> unsigned long
Am 07.08.2013 07:52, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
What exactly is a platform device anyway?
Originally it was a "something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
had
Hi Greg,
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:37:25PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> I don't like this at all, sorry.
>>>
>>
[snip]
>> Don't shoot the messenger please...
>>
>> This is all about fixing a crash without messing too many
Hi Greg,
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:37:25PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
I don't like this at all, sorry.
[snip]
Don't shoot the messenger please...
This is all about fixing a crash without messing too many things.
I
Am 07.08.2013 07:52, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
What exactly is a platform device anyway?
Originally it was a something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
had
* Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com [130806 02:44]:
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
+
static int _omap_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
Hi Tony,
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com [130806 02:44]:
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
+
static int
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>
> >> What exactly is a platform device anyway?
> >
> > Originally it was a "something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
> > had memory-mapped i/o." Like the PS2 keyboard
Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>> What exactly is a platform device anyway?
>
> Originally it was a "something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
> had memory-mapped i/o." Like the PS2 keyboard controller.
>
> Embedded systems got ahold of this and went to town, and
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:37:25PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> > I don't like this at all, sorry.
> >
>
> Don't shoot the messenger please...
>
> This is all about fixing a crash without messing too many things.
I understand, it's not your fault at all.
> > And I was waiting for the day
Hi Greg,
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Removing any omap device always resulted in a crash; turns out
>> BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE is not the last notifier event sent in the
>> course of removing the
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Removing any omap device always resulted in a crash; turns out
> BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE is not the last notifier event sent in the
> course of removing the device, the correct event is
> BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER, which still is
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Removing any omap device always resulted in a crash; turns out
BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE is not the last notifier event sent in the
course of removing the device, the correct event is
BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER, which still is not
Hi Greg,
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:44AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Removing any omap device always resulted in a crash; turns out
BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE is not the last notifier event sent in the
course of removing the device,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:37:25PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
I don't like this at all, sorry.
Don't shoot the messenger please...
This is all about fixing a crash without messing too many things.
I understand, it's not your fault at all.
And I was waiting for the day when
Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
What exactly is a platform device anyway?
Originally it was a something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
had memory-mapped i/o. Like the PS2 keyboard controller.
Embedded systems got ahold of this and went to town, and made
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 06.08.2013 12:14, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
What exactly is a platform device anyway?
Originally it was a something that wasn't connected to a bus, but just
had memory-mapped i/o. Like the PS2 keyboard controller.
20 matches
Mail list logo
