On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:48 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:32:59AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Or I can queue it up if you prefer.
>
> Doesn't matter to me - it doesn't have any dependencies to previous
> patches so however you like.
OK, I'll take it.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:32:59AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Or I can queue it up if you prefer.
Doesn't matter to me - it doesn't have any dependencies to previous
patches so however you like.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:31 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > From: Borislav Petkov
> >
> > Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the
> > boot_cpu_has() variant.
> >
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Si
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the
> boot_cpu_has() variant.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
>
From: Borislav Petkov
Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the
boot_cpu_has() variant.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Len Brown
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada
Cc: Viresh Kumar
---
drive
5 matches
Mail list logo
