Lock(&iommu->lock) without disabling irq causes lockdep warnings.
========================================================
WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
5.11.0-rc1+ #828 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1H/120 just changed the state of lock:
ffffffffad9ea1b8 (device_domain_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at:
iommu_flush_dev_iotlb.part.0+0x32/0x120
but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
(&iommu->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&iommu->lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(device_domain_lock);
lock(&iommu->lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(device_domain_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index b16a4791acfb..18a9f05df407 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev,
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain;
struct device_domain_info *info;
struct intel_svm *svm = NULL;
+ unsigned long iflags;
int ret = 0;
if (WARN_ON(!iommu) || !data)
@@ -400,12 +401,12 @@ int intel_svm_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct device *dev,
* each bind of a new device even with an existing PASID, we need to
* call the nested mode setup function here.
*/
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, iflags);
ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, dev,
(pgd_t *)(uintptr_t)data->gpgd,
data->hpasid, &data->vendor.vtd,
dmar_domain,
data->addr_width);
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, iflags);
if (ret) {
dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "Failed to set up PASID %llu in nested
mode, Err %d\n",
data->hpasid, ret);
@@ -505,6 +506,7 @@ intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, unsigned int flags,
struct device_domain_info *info;
struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
struct intel_svm *svm = NULL;
+ unsigned long iflags;
int pasid_max;
int ret;
@@ -624,14 +626,14 @@ intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, unsigned int flags,
}
}
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, iflags);
ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev,
mm ? mm->pgd : init_mm.pgd,
svm->pasid, FLPT_DEFAULT_DID,
(mm ? 0 : PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) |
(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) ?
PASID_FLAG_FL5LP : 0));
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, iflags);
if (ret) {
if (mm)
mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, mm);
@@ -651,14 +653,14 @@ intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, unsigned int flags,
* Binding a new device with existing PASID, need to setup
* the PASID entry.
*/
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, iflags);
ret = intel_pasid_setup_first_level(iommu, dev,
mm ? mm->pgd : init_mm.pgd,
svm->pasid, FLPT_DEFAULT_DID,
(mm ? 0 :
PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) |
(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) ?
PASID_FLAG_FL5LP : 0));
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, iflags);
if (ret) {
kfree(sdev);
goto out;
--
2.25.1
