On 08/10/2016 08:16 AM, js1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Joonsoo Kim
There is a memory waste problem if we define field on struct page_ext
by hard-coding. Entry size of struct page_ext includes the size of
those fields even if it is disabled at runtime. Now, extra memory request
at runtime is poss
From: Joonsoo Kim
There is a memory waste problem if we define field on struct page_ext
by hard-coding. Entry size of struct page_ext includes the size of
those fields even if it is disabled at runtime. Now, extra memory request
at runtime is possible so page_owner don't need to define it's own f
2 matches
Mail list logo
