On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:03:11PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:52:20PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Since the handling for max_raw_read is now inside regmap_raw_read there
> > should be no need for client drivers to query as max_raw_read.
>
> No, they might need to kn
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:52:20PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Since the handling for max_raw_read is now inside regmap_raw_read there
> should be no need for client drivers to query as max_raw_read.
No, they might need to know if things are going to be combined into a
single transaction - some
Since the handling for max_raw_read is now inside regmap_raw_read there
should be no need for client drivers to query as max_raw_read.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c | 11 ---
include/linux/regmap.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --gi
3 matches
Mail list logo
