Hi Grant,
On Mar 19, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
> > wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> Ok. Nonethele
Hi Grant,
On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> Ok. Nonetheless it's not hard to avoid a recursive approach here.
>>
>> How can I find the maxi
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > Ok. Nonetheless it's not hard to avoid a recursive approach here.
>
> How can I find the maximum phandle value of a subtree without using recursion.
> Note that the
Hi David,
On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:06:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi David
On Jan
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:06:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi David
> >>
> >> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 0
Hi
On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Introduce support for dynami
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution.
> >> Using it, it is possible to p
Hi David
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution.
>> Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's
>> been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution.
> Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's
> been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted at the kernel
> live tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution.
Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's
been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted at the kernel
live tree.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
---
.../devicetree/dynamic-resolution-notes.txt| 25 ++
drivers/of/
11 matches
Mail list logo